Clinton: It’s just Politics

Nothing she says really matters. She is just saying it because focus groups tell her that it will increase her margins by some small %.

Today we see this:

Screen Shot 2015-04-16 at 3.02.59 PM

But she has already been in positions of power and didn’t use her power to be anyone’s champion but her own.  The term “self-serving” comes to mind.

1.  She was a Senator.  As Senator, she never once was a champion for everyday Americans.  Ever.  She sponsored no legislation.  She led the charge on no legislative agendas.  There are no “Clinton Bills” for anything.

2.  She was Secretary of State.  She could have used that position to Champion for Americans. But she didn’t.  She championed for Palestinians.

3.  She owns a private foundation with $2 billion of assets that she can direct go anywhere she pleases.  She can really make a difference for millions of Americans with that money.  She instead spends it on “global initiatives”.   Here’s an idea:  Give all that money to children’s hospitals in America to pay for the medical bills of US citizens.  THAT would make a difference in the lives of everyday Americans.

Once again, the words coming out of her mouth do not match the reality.  With her, they never have.

But then, Obama stole her other campaign slogan, “change”.  And since her party is in power, she can’t run on that again.

I have always thought that America is ready for its first black president.  I just didn’t want THIS guy to be it because he was hopelessly unqualified for the job and he would predictably appoint petty tyrants throughout the government.  Similarly, there is no question that America could easily elect a first female president.  Just not THIS one.  If that was so important, where were all those feminist groups jumping on the Palin bandwagon?



About No One

I am totally non-threatening
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Clinton: It’s just Politics

  1. ddswaterloo says:

    Come on ‘Hilliary the hilarious’ , you’re such a hypocrite.


    Politicians past and present must be held accountable. ‘Just obeying orders’ is not an excuse.

    Do you wish to spend the rest of your life supporting swarms of non-citizens streaming across our orders and voting for you to give them more of your earnings?

    Translation: The state hides behind its guns and use of force while it avoids accountability to the population for the creation of multiculturalism, White genocide and state over-reach into everything.


    • No One says:

      Thanks for visiting and leaving a comment. I would like to urge you to take a deep breath. You made six points in five sentences. Doing so, you create the conditions that make deliberate and throughful responses to you tedious. It doesn’t mean I doing or would not agree with you. But your ADHD style of writting is something I cannot focus on. Bumper sticker deep philosophies are not a good basis for conversation.


  2. Slick Willy says:

    No One: let me try…

    Waterloo, I understand your angst. However, it is hard to have a discussion when there is little support given to each statement.

    ‘One Problem’ is a fine example. I have no clue to what you are referring. I really want to know, as it sounds like a point I have not been exposed to before. More detail would help

    Politicians must be held accountable: This is clear and concise. What are your ideas for doing so? Are we talking criminal penalties, civil fines, or what? Hanging? I can think of quite a few politicians who need a neck stretching, but under what circumstances, and who decides?

    ‘swarms of non-citizens:’ I agree with the whole lack of borders angst, and ALL of the ruling class (politicians) are guilty here. The answer to your question as posed to Hillary would be “Yes.” She believes that an aristocracy needs peasant classes to scrape and bow to its every whim. She intends to be immune to the impacts this produces on society. They will not be able to take Hillary’s earnings, as those will be shielded, like all liberals. Liberals and socialists (is there a difference any more?) always think the public should give more to worthy causes (as they determine them) but never seem to follow through with their private lives.

    Translation: guns and citizen control of them are the only thing stopping today’s socialists, because they realize that they personally might become a target, should they ever go too far. The Second Amendment is not for hunting, or self defense from a criminal, but for protection from the political class.

    Hope that helps…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s